Letters
A concrete post with a clear subject and real-world context.
Every quarter the editorial desk clears a morning, puts the kettle on, and spreads the next three months of the magazine across a long table. The session in question happened on a Tuesday, with rain against the windows and a stack of contributor emails we had been avoiding for a week. What follows is a plain record of what we decided, what we argued about, and what we still do not know.
The first thing on the table was the regional balance. We have been heavy on the Western Cape for two issues running, mostly because that is where most of our pitches come from. The plan for the coming cycle is to commission at least four pieces from KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng, and to pay travel costs for two of them rather than asking contributors to absorb the trip. That decision changes the budget, and it changes the shape of the issue.
The second item was the Letters section. Readers have been writing in about the weekly letter more than the print pieces, which surprised us. We are keeping the format as it is, but adding a short reply column where we answer one reader question properly instead of skimming three. The first one will come from a reader in Pietermaritzburg who asked how we choose which small towns to cover.
What we did not settle: the photo journal schedule. Two of the drives we wanted to document depend on a photographer who is only free in late autumn, and the light in the Karoo is not the same then. We are holding that decision until we hear back from him. If it falls through, the piece runs as an essay with fewer images, which is a different thing entirely.
The next planning session is set for the end of the month. Until then, the notes sit in a shared document, and anyone on the team can add to them. That is usually where the better ideas come from anyway.
Three pieces we are working through this month, each at a different stage. One is still being shaped, one is out with contributors for a first read, and one has already been rewritten once after the notes came back.
This page frames a concrete subject instead of using a generic heading. It explains what is being considered, why it matters in the site's context, and what detail a reader can expect next. The copy is intentionally plain and specific, so it reads like a real content item.
Read the piece
This item focuses on practical use, tradeoffs, and decisions that a reader may recognize. It avoids broad promotional claims and keeps the topic tied to a clear situation. The description gives enough substance for a real page rather than a placeholder card.
Read the piece
This page gives the third item its own reason to exist. It covers a separate angle, includes concrete context, and avoids repeating the same promise in different words. The result should feel like a planned article, project, review, or offer.
Read the piece